<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for City Block</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alexblock.net/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alexblock.net</link>
	<description>a work in progress...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 01:23:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What&#8217;s wrong with &#8216;Metro Brown?&#8217; by Graphic standards on the Subway &#8211; a lesson for Metro as it evaluates the future of &#8216;Metro Brown&#8217; &#171; City Block</title>
		<link>http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2836&#038;cpage=1#comment-10314</link>
		<dc:creator>Graphic standards on the Subway &#8211; a lesson for Metro as it evaluates the future of &#8216;Metro Brown&#8217; &#171; City Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 01:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2836#comment-10314</guid>
		<description>[...] puts Metro&#8217;s recent discussions about moving away from &#8216;Metro Brown&#8217; into context. If any of New York&#8217;s standards look familiar, it is because Vignelli worked on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] puts Metro&#8217;s recent discussions about moving away from &#8216;Metro Brown&#8217; into context. If any of New York&#8217;s standards look familiar, it is because Vignelli worked on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Norman Foster&#8217;s aerotropolis by Alex Block</title>
		<link>http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2097&#038;cpage=1#comment-10296</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 02:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2097#comment-10296</guid>
		<description>For more on those photos from Boston dealing with their airport, see this article in the Atlantic Cities: 

http://www.theatlanticcities.com/neighborhoods/2013/05/40-year-old-images-show-east-boston-grappling-expanding-logan-airport/5472/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more on those photos from Boston dealing with their airport, see this article in the Atlantic Cities: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.theatlanticcities.com/neighborhoods/2013/05/40-year-old-images-show-east-boston-grappling-expanding-logan-airport/5472/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theatlanticcities.com/neighborhoods/2013/05/40-year-old-images-show-east-boston-grappling-expanding-logan-airport/5472/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Capacity on the Northeast Corridor by Alex Block</title>
		<link>http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2805&#038;cpage=1#comment-10247</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 02:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2805#comment-10247</guid>
		<description>So, FRA is trying to reassure everyone that this is OK: 

http://dc.streetsblog.org/2013/04/24/fra-responds-amtrak-will-be-able-to-use-proven-trainsets/

&lt;i&gt;The FRA and Amtrak are working very closely and cooperatively with each other and worldwide train manufactures through the Rail Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC) to achieve a consensus on safety design standards. There is unanimous consensus on the path forward with all of our stakeholders, including Amtrak, all international railcar manufacturers and other partners. Together through the RSAC process we are writing safety standards will allow proven trainsets used in other countries to operate in the U.S. market. Our process is and has always been a fluid and iterative process. Collectively, our goal is to establish and implement safety standards that are appropriate for U.S. operating environments so that passengers, employees and communities along rail routes are and remain safe.&lt;/i&gt;

Which could either mean the adoption of the same standards used in Europe or Japan, or it could be the Acela all over again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, FRA is trying to reassure everyone that this is OK: </p>
<p><a href="http://dc.streetsblog.org/2013/04/24/fra-responds-amtrak-will-be-able-to-use-proven-trainsets/" rel="nofollow">http://dc.streetsblog.org/2013/04/24/fra-responds-amtrak-will-be-able-to-use-proven-trainsets/</a></p>
<p><i>The FRA and Amtrak are working very closely and cooperatively with each other and worldwide train manufactures through the Rail Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC) to achieve a consensus on safety design standards. There is unanimous consensus on the path forward with all of our stakeholders, including Amtrak, all international railcar manufacturers and other partners. Together through the RSAC process we are writing safety standards will allow proven trainsets used in other countries to operate in the U.S. market. Our process is and has always been a fluid and iterative process. Collectively, our goal is to establish and implement safety standards that are appropriate for U.S. operating environments so that passengers, employees and communities along rail routes are and remain safe.</i></p>
<p>Which could either mean the adoption of the same standards used in Europe or Japan, or it could be the Acela all over again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Capacity on the Northeast Corridor by Alon Levy</title>
		<link>http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2805&#038;cpage=1#comment-10238</link>
		<dc:creator>Alon Levy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 03:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2805#comment-10238</guid>
		<description>The FRA rule changes are mostly about cant deficiency and are reasonable. The main complaint re the Acela was not regulatory cant deficiency limits but buff strength, a rule that the FRA didn&#039;t address in this round of revision but has said it is reconsidering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FRA rule changes are mostly about cant deficiency and are reasonable. The main complaint re the Acela was not regulatory cant deficiency limits but buff strength, a rule that the FRA didn&#8217;t address in this round of revision but has said it is reconsidering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Towards a DC S-Bahn, part 2 by Capacity on the Northeast Corridor &#171; City Block</title>
		<link>http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2486&#038;cpage=1#comment-10237</link>
		<dc:creator>Capacity on the Northeast Corridor &#171; City Block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 02:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2486#comment-10237</guid>
		<description>[...] are needed to allow for a combination of increased intercity and commuter services (or even better), and other bottlenecks are likely in need of greater capacity for freight expansion on adjacent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are needed to allow for a combination of increased intercity and commuter services (or even better), and other bottlenecks are likely in need of greater capacity for freight expansion on adjacent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Metro&#8217;s &#8216;station of the future&#8217; &#8211; why mess with what works? by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2794&#038;cpage=1#comment-10207</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 22:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2794#comment-10207</guid>
		<description>&quot;Metro Brown&quot; works well with the red tiles and gray concrete (and brass fixtures) and should be kept. 

I would change the kiosks to get rid of the windows entirely. Let the entire perimeter be a counter, making the station manager more accessible and visible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Metro Brown&#8221; works well with the red tiles and gray concrete (and brass fixtures) and should be kept. </p>
<p>I would change the kiosks to get rid of the windows entirely. Let the entire perimeter be a counter, making the station manager more accessible and visible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Disasters: the more things change, the more they stay the same by Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2786&#038;cpage=1#comment-10206</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 19:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2786#comment-10206</guid>
		<description>When I was in New Orleans for a conference a few weeks ago, I rented a bike and rode around the city.  One thing that particularly struck me when I visited the Lower Ninth Ward is that, when I was coming back, I had to wait for several minutes at a drawbridge on the ship canal, and then a few blocks later I had to wait for several minutes again at a freight train crossing.  The Lower Ninth is really cut off from the rest of the city quite a bit by these pieces of infrastructure, so it&#039;s doubly discouraging to new residents to find out that there aren&#039;t a lot of stores and food available in the neighborhood.

And I think that &quot;Thinking, Fast and Slow&quot;, is one of the most important books of any sort to have come out in the past few years - urbanists and non-urbanists alike should read it and really think about its implications for what one thinks it is to have a good life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in New Orleans for a conference a few weeks ago, I rented a bike and rode around the city.  One thing that particularly struck me when I visited the Lower Ninth Ward is that, when I was coming back, I had to wait for several minutes at a drawbridge on the ship canal, and then a few blocks later I had to wait for several minutes again at a freight train crossing.  The Lower Ninth is really cut off from the rest of the city quite a bit by these pieces of infrastructure, so it&#8217;s doubly discouraging to new residents to find out that there aren&#8217;t a lot of stores and food available in the neighborhood.</p>
<p>And I think that &#8220;Thinking, Fast and Slow&#8221;, is one of the most important books of any sort to have come out in the past few years &#8211; urbanists and non-urbanists alike should read it and really think about its implications for what one thinks it is to have a good life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Managing on-street parking: zoning is not the way by RTA</title>
		<link>http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2740&#038;cpage=1#comment-10040</link>
		<dc:creator>RTA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2740#comment-10040</guid>
		<description>Just because a developer provides parking doesn&#039;t mean all residents will actually park there, rather than on the street.  If on-street is free and convenient, that&#039;s where they will go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because a developer provides parking doesn&#8217;t mean all residents will actually park there, rather than on the street.  If on-street is free and convenient, that&#8217;s where they will go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What would happen without parking requirements? by benschon</title>
		<link>http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2750&#038;cpage=1#comment-10029</link>
		<dc:creator>benschon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 17:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2750#comment-10029</guid>
		<description>Evidence abounds that zoning mandates to put in parking results in higher prices and less housing. Not even an argument anymore. Portland recently modeled this (http://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/article/420062), also demonstrated in San Francisco (http://www.uctc.net/papers/380.pdf), and research confirmed by Todd Litman at VTPI (http://www.vtpi.org/park-hou.pdf). Also, just ask any developer!

Complicating factors: because of huge pent-up demand, no-parking apartments can rent at relatively high prices. This allows opponents to say, &quot;$1000/month for a studio isn&#039;t affordable housing!&quot; Also, eliminating parking reduces development costs and increases profits. This fuels &quot;greedy developer&quot; accusations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evidence abounds that zoning mandates to put in parking results in higher prices and less housing. Not even an argument anymore. Portland recently modeled this (<a href="http://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/article/420062" rel="nofollow">http://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/article/420062</a>), also demonstrated in San Francisco (<a href="http://www.uctc.net/papers/380.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.uctc.net/papers/380.pdf</a>), and research confirmed by Todd Litman at VTPI (<a href="http://www.vtpi.org/park-hou.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.vtpi.org/park-hou.pdf</a>). Also, just ask any developer!</p>
<p>Complicating factors: because of huge pent-up demand, no-parking apartments can rent at relatively high prices. This allows opponents to say, &#8220;$1000/month for a studio isn&#8217;t affordable housing!&#8221; Also, eliminating parking reduces development costs and increases profits. This fuels &#8220;greedy developer&#8221; accusations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What would happen without parking requirements? by Indianapolis Parking Minimums Force Walmart to Ask for Less Parking &#124; Streetsblog.net</title>
		<link>http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2750&#038;cpage=1#comment-10026</link>
		<dc:creator>Indianapolis Parking Minimums Force Walmart to Ask for Less Parking &#124; Streetsblog.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexblock.net/?p=2750#comment-10026</guid>
		<description>[...] on the Network today: City Block shares a new report that says parking requirements in Los Angeles present a real barrier to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the Network today: City Block shares a new report that says parking requirements in Los Angeles present a real barrier to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
